See how a candidate actually codes, not how they whiteboard under pressure
Trivia questions and whiteboard theatre tell you who rehearsed, not who can build. InterviewGod's coding interview platform runs live, proctored coding rounds in a real editor, so your engineers watch how a candidate reasons through a problem and writes working code.
A shared coding environment, structured problems, integrity checks, and a scored record — the deep round you run with candidates who already cleared the upstream screen.
Banao — runs live coding rounds to hire engineers for its own ~300-person company.
A coding interview should show real ability under realistic conditions. The platform makes that easy to run and fair to score.
Live shared editor
Candidate and interviewer code together in a real environment, so you watch reasoning and approach, not just a final answer.
Structured problem sets
Calibrated problems for the role and level, so interviews test what the job needs instead of whatever the interviewer recalls.
Proctoring & integrity
Integrity checks on remote coding rounds so a strong performance reflects the candidate, not an off-screen helper.
Scored, reviewable records
Each round is captured and scored, so a panel can review the actual code and reasoning rather than rely on memory.
We hire our own engineers through live coding rounds
Banao runs live, proctored coding rounds to hire engineers for its own teams. The platform is built around what our interviewers actually need to judge whether someone can build, not just talk.
Screen automatically, interview deeply
Pair the live platform with technical screening automation: the upstream screen filters who reaches a live coding round, so senior interviewer time goes only to candidates worth it.
Metrics shown dotted (··) are being finalised in our case-study metrics pack. The deployment is real; we will not publish a number before it is verified.
We hire our own engineers on it
Banao runs live, proctored coding rounds to hire for its own ~300-person engineering company. The platform is shaped by what our interviewers need to tell a builder from a memoriser — because we make that call constantly.
An interview tool built by people who do not hire engineers at scale shows. This one is built by a company that does, and depends on the result.
InterviewGod
Runs Banao's own live coding interviews.
Vikaas
Sources the engineers those coding rounds evaluate.
When a live coding round isn't the right test
A coding interview measures coding, not everything. We will be clear about its limits:
Senior architecture roles
a system-design discussion may tell you more than a coding exercise.
Roles that are not hands-on
if the job is not writing code, do not gate it on a coding round.
Skipping the upstream screen
running live rounds on unfiltered applicants wastes interviewer time — screen first.
We calibrate problems and interviewers before live rounds count.
Screening Pilot Sprint
We set up problem sets for your roles, calibrate your interviewers on one bar, and run sample rounds so scoring is consistent before real candidates. Yours to judge.
Configure & integrate
We tune problems, proctoring, and scoring to your stack and wire records into your ATS so they travel with the candidate.
Run & pair with the screen
Run live rounds for candidates who passed the upstream screen, with recorded, scored results your panel can review.
The questions buyers ask first.
How is this different from technical screening automation?
Does it stop cheating in remote coding rounds?
Will interviews be consistent across our interviewers?
Should we screen before the live round?
See who can actually code
Bring the engineering roles where interviews keep getting it wrong. In 30 minutes we'll scope live coding rounds that show real ability.
Book a demo →