Hire at volume without losing the good candidates between stages
At hundreds or thousands of applicants a month, the bottleneck is not finding people — it is screening them before they take another offer. InterviewGod automates the top of the funnel so volume stops meaning chaos and dropped candidates.
Screening, assessment, and shortlisting run on one consistent bar at scale, so your recruiters spend their hours on candidates who already passed, not on first contact with everyone.
Banao — keeps a 300-person company hiring without the funnel collapsing under volume.
Volume breaks the manual parts of hiring first. We automate exactly those, and leave the human calls to humans.
Automated screening at scale
Thousands of applicants screened against one bar without adding recruiters to keep pace with the inbound.
Multi-stage funnel flow
Candidates move from apply to shortlist through defined stages, so nobody good is lost in a spreadsheet between rounds.
Consistent ranking
Every candidate scored the same way, so the shortlist is comparable across recruiters, regions, and weeks.
ATS-connected
Shortlists and scores push into your ATS so the funnel stays in your system of record, not a side sheet.
Continuous hiring at the scale of a 300-person company
Banao keeps a ~300-person company staffed without the funnel buckling, by automating the screening and shortlisting that manual recruiting cannot do at volume.
Thousands of monthly applicants moved without dropouts
For operations hiring at scale, InterviewGod runs the top of the funnel so recruiters reach candidates while they are still interested rather than after they have accepted elsewhere.
Metrics shown dotted (··) are being finalised in our case-study metrics pack. The deployments are live; we will not publish a number before it is verified.
We hire at volume on this ourselves
Keeping a ~300-person company staffed is a high-volume problem, and Banao runs it on InterviewGod. The funnel automation you would buy is the one our own recruiting depends on.
A vendor that has never had to move thousands of candidates without dropping the good ones is guessing at scale. We do it for ourselves.
InterviewGod
Runs Banao's own high-volume screening and shortlisting.
Vikaas
Fills the top of the funnel the automation then screens.
When automation isn't your problem
Volume automation only pays off when volume is the actual constraint. We will tell you when it isn't:
Low applicant counts
a careful manual process beats automating a trickle.
Senior or specialist roles
depth, not throughput, is the challenge — automate the screen, keep the judgement human.
A broken job spec
more automation just rejects faster against the wrong criteria. Fix the spec first.
We prove it on one high-volume funnel before going wide.
Screening Pilot Sprint
We automate one high-volume role and measure throughput and shortlist quality against your current process. Yours to judge either way.
Configure & integrate
We set the stages, the bar, and the ATS connection so the funnel runs in your system of record.
Run at scale
Roll out across high-volume funnels, with capacity that does not need new recruiters to grow.
The questions buyers ask first.
How is this different from AI interview screening?
Will good candidates still get human attention?
Can it handle seasonal spikes?
Does it connect to our ATS?
Tell us your monthly applicant volume
Bring the funnel that is overwhelming your recruiters. In 30 minutes we'll scope automating the top of it.
Book a demo →